Analisis Komparasi Penerapan Virtual Local Area Network Pada Software Defined Network

Irhaz Muhajir, Denar Regata Akbi, Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi

Abstract


Industri telekomunikasi dengan skalabilitas yang tinggi tentunya sangat membutuhkan prototipe teknologi jaringan untuk dapat bekerja secara terpusat di berbagai kondisi ekosistem jaringan. Melalui teknologi Virtual Network yaitu VLAN yang dapat mendedikasikan perangkat jaringan tersendiri yang secara fisik terletak pada satu struktur jaringan yang logis. Tujuan dari peneilitan ini adalah untuk menganalisis implementasi VLAN pada lingkungan Software Defined Networking (SDN). Beberapa tipe controller dievaluasi menggunakan metrik jaringan seperti throughput, jitter, latency dan packet delivery ratio yang memanfaatkan Openflow sebagai protokol komunikasi yang menghubungkan bidang kontrol dan bidang data. Peneliti memfokuskan untuk mengevaluasi kemampuan controller SDN Opendaylight, floodlight, ONOS, POX dan Ryu pada Openflow stream forwarding yang dapat memasang dan menghapus header VLAN. Hasil pengujian skenario yang diusulkan menunjukkan bahwa semua jenis controller dapat berjalan dengan baik dengan memberikan instruksi ke lapisan forwarding yang dilewati paket data saat dikirimkan. Melalui pengujian konektivitas dan parameter metrik jaringan, karakteristik controller yang diharapkan dan direkomendasikan adalah controller yang berjalan pada bahasa pemrograman Java. Performa dan modularitas yang tinggi sebagai keunggulannya, fitur yang memadai, meskipun lebih sulit untuk dipahami dibandingkan dengan yang berjalan pada berbasis python. Controller jaringan SDN seperti ONOS mendapatkan hasil yang signifikan dalam proses pengiriman data aktual dengan nilai rata-rata nilai throughput 13.570 kbps. Sedangkan Opendaylight menunjukkan persentase delivery ratio yang stabil untuk semua skenario pengiriman data

Keywords


SDN;VLAN;VLAN Tagging;Controller

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. L. Stancu, S. Halunga, A. Vulpe, G. Suciu, O. Fratu, and E. C. Popovici, “A comparison between several Software Defined Networking controllers,” 2015 12th Int. Conf. Telecommun. Mod. Satell. Cable Broadcast. Serv. TELSIKS 2015, pp. 223–226, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TELSKS.2015.7357774.

Y. Zhang, L. Cui, W. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “A survey on software defined networking with multiple controllers,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 103, pp. 101–118, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2017.11.015.

A. A. Ateya et al., “Chaotic salp swarm algorithm for SDN multi-controller networks,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1001–1012, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.12.015.

K. Poularakis, Q. Qin, E. M. Nahum, M. Rio, and L. Tassiulas, “Flexible SDN control in tactical ad hoc networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 85, pp. 71–80, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.10.012.

F. AL-Tam and N. Correia, “Fractional switch migration in multi-controller software-defined networking,” Comput. Networks, vol. 157, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2019.04.011.

L. Han, Z. Li, W. Liu, K. Dai, and W. Qu, “Minimum control latency of SDN controller placement,” Proc. - 15th IEEE Int. Conf. Trust. Secur. Priv. Comput. Commun. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data Sci. Eng. 14th IEEE Int. Symp. Parallel Distrib. Proce, pp. 2175–2180, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TrustCom.2016.0334.

V. G. Nguyen and Y. H. Kim, “SDN-based enterprise and campus networks: A case of VLAN management,” J. Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 511–524, 2016, doi: 10.3745/JIPS.03.0039.

R. Tulloh, R. M. Negara, and A. N. Hidayat, “Simulasi Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) Berbasis Software Defined Network (SDN) Menggunakan POX Controller,” J. INFOTEL - Inform. Telekomun. Elektron., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 129, 2015, doi: 10.20895/infotel.v7i2.40.

M. B. Lehocine and M. Batouche, “Flexibility of managing VLAN filtering and segmentation in SDN networks,” 2017 Int. Symp. Networks, Comput. Commun. ISNCC 2017, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ISNCC.2017.8071999.

M. Koerner and O. Kao, “MAC Based Dynamic VLAN Tagging with OpenFlow for WLAN Access Networks,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 94, pp. 497–501, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.077.

S. M. Anggara, “Pengujian Performa Kontroler Software-defined Network (SDN): POX dan Floodlight 2012/2 013,” p. 44, 2015.

R. Khondoker, A. Zaalouk, R. Marx, and K. Bayarou, “Feature-based comparison and selection of Software Defined Networking (SDN) controllers,” 2014 World Congr. Comput. Appl. Inf. Syst. WCCAIS 2014, 2014, doi: 10.1109/WCCAIS.2014.6916572.

O. Salman, I. H. Elhajj, A. Kayssi, and A. Chehab, “SDN controllers: A comparative study,” Proc. 18th Mediterr. Electrotech. Conf. Intell. Effic. Technol. Serv. Citizen, MELECON 2016, no. 978, pp. 18–20, 2016, doi: 10.1109/MELCON.2016.7495430.

I. Ummah, “Perancangan Simulasi Jaringan Virtual Berbasis Software-Define Networking,” Indones. J. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2016, doi: 10.21108/indojc.2016.1.1.20.

J. Chen, J. Chen, J. Ling, and W. Zhang, “Failure recovery using vlan-tag in SDN: High speed with low memory requirement,” 2016 IEEE 35th Int. Perform. Comput. Commun. Conf. IPCCC 2016, 2017, doi: 10.1109/PCCC.2016.7820627.

A. Mendiola et al., “Multi-domain bandwidth on demand service provisioning using SDN,” IEEE NETSOFT 2016 - 2016 IEEE NetSoft Conf. Work. Software-Defined Infrastruct. Networks, Clouds, IoT Serv., pp. 353–354, 2016, doi: 10.1109/NETSOFT.2016.7502407.

S. Asadollahi and B. Goswami, “Experimenting with scalability of floodlight controller in software defined networks,” Int. Conf. Electr. Electron. Commun. Comput. Technol. Optim. Tech. ICEECCOT 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 288–292, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICEECCOT.2017.8284684.

C. Fancy and M. Pushpalatha, “Performance evaluation of SDN controllers POX and floodlight in mininet emulation environment,” Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Sustain. Syst. ICISS 2017, no. Iciss, pp. 695–699, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ISS1.2017.8389262.

A. Bondkovskii, J. Keeney, S. Van Der Meer, and S. Weber, “Qualitative comparison of open-source SDN controllers,” Proc. NOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Netw. Oper. Manag. Symp., no. Noms, pp. 889–894, 2016, doi: 10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502921.

Y. Zhao, L. Iannone, and M. Riguidel, “On the performance of SDN controllers: A reality check,” 2015 IEEE Conf. Netw. Funct. Virtualization Softw. Defin. Network, NFV-SDN 2015, pp. 79–85, 2016, doi: 10.1109/NFV-SDN.2015.7387410.

A. Vishnu Priya and N. Radhika, “Performance comparison of SDN OpenFlow controllers,” Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4–5, pp. 467–479, 2019, doi: 10.1504/IJCAET.2019.100444.

M. I. Lali, R. U. Mustafa, F. Ahsan, M. S. Nawaz, and W. Aslam, “Performance Evaluation of Software Defined Networking vs. Traditional Networks,” A quartelry Int. Sci. J., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://www.thenucleuspak.org.pk/index.php/Nucleus/article/view/95/24.

A. H. Eljack, A. H. M. Hassan, and H. H. Elamin, “Performance analysis of ONOS and floodlight SDN controllers based on TCP and UDP traffic,” Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Control. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2019, ICCCEEE 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICCCEEE46830.2019.9071189.

J. Ali, S. Lee, and B. H. Roh, “Performance analysis of POX and Ryu with different SDN topologies,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 244–249, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3209914.3209931.

M. F. M. Ryhan Uddin, “Performance Analysis of SDN Based Firewalls: POX vs. ODL,” IEEE, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICAEE48663.2019.8975667.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/sentra.v0i6.3899

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Seketariat

Fakultas Teknik

Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Kampus III

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang, 65144